Nathan W. v. Anthem BlueCross BlueShield of Wis. (U.S. Dist. Ct. for the Dist. of UT, case no. 2:20-cv-00122-JNP-JCB, March 5, 2021). Judge Jill N. Parrish denied Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Parity Act claim because Plaintiff had sufficiently met the three-part test to state a claim: 1) identify a specific MH/SUD treatment limitation; 2) identify analogous med/surg care; and 3) allege a plausible disparity.